riscv/qemu - qemu - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

118538 Commits

68 Branches

448 Tags

581 MiB

Tree: fdbfbfc75e

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Markus Armbruster	6af9a8fc8e	tests/qapi-schema: Rename tests from data- to args- Since every schema entity has 'data', the data- prefix conveys no information. These tests actually exercise commands. Only commands have arguments, so change the prefix to to args-. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>	11 years ago
Eric Blake	dd883c6f05	qapi: More rigourous checking of types Now that we know every expression is valid with regards to its keys, we can add further tests that those keys refer to valid types. With this patch, all uses of a type (the 'data': of command, type, union, alternate, and event; the 'returns': of command; the 'base': of type and union) must resolve to an appropriate subset of metatypes declared by the current qapi parse; this includes recursing into each member of a data dictionary. Dealing with '**' and nested anonymous structs will be done in later patches. Update the testsuite to match improved output. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>	11 years ago
Eric Blake	0d8b9fb5f2	qapi: Add some type check tests Demonstrate that the qapi generator silently parses confusing types, which may cause other errors later on. Later patches will update the expected results as the generator is made stricter. Most of the new tests focus on blatant errors. But returns-whitelist is a case where we have historically allowed returning something other than a JSON object from particular commands; we have to keep that behavior to avoid breaking clients, but it would be nicer to avoid adding such commands in the future, because any return that is not an (array of) object cannot be easily extended if future qemu wants to return additional information. The QMP protocol already documents that clients should ignore unknown dictionary keys, but does not require clients to have to handle more than one type of JSON object. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>	11 years ago

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Markus Armbruster

6af9a8fc8e

tests/qapi-schema: Rename tests from data- to args-

Since every schema entity has 'data', the data- prefix conveys no
information.  These tests actually exercise commands.  Only commands
have arguments, so change the prefix to to args-.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

11 years ago

Eric Blake

dd883c6f05

qapi: More rigourous checking of types

Now that we know every expression is valid with regards to
its keys, we can add further tests that those keys refer to
valid types.  With this patch, all uses of a type (the 'data':
of command, type, union, alternate, and event; the 'returns':
of command; the 'base': of type and union) must resolve to an
appropriate subset of metatypes  declared by the current qapi
parse; this includes recursing into each member of a data
dictionary.  Dealing with '**' and nested anonymous structs
will be done in later patches.

Update the testsuite to match improved output.

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

11 years ago

Eric Blake

0d8b9fb5f2

qapi: Add some type check tests

Demonstrate that the qapi generator silently parses confusing
types, which may cause other errors later on. Later patches
will update the expected results as the generator is made stricter.

Most of the new tests focus on blatant errors.  But
returns-whitelist is a case where we have historically allowed
returning something other than a JSON object from particular
commands; we have to keep that behavior to avoid breaking clients,
but it would be nicer to avoid adding such commands in the future,
because any return that is not an (array of) object cannot be
easily extended if future qemu wants to return additional
information.  The QMP protocol already documents that clients
should ignore unknown dictionary keys, but does not require
clients to have to handle more than one type of JSON object.

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

11 years ago

1 Commits (fdbfbfc75e9e5ee76693f32d7e67cf04ff804413)