riscv/qemu - qemu - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Markus Armbruster	012d4c96e2	qapi: Make visitor functions taking Error ** return bool, not void See recent commit "error: Document Error API usage rules" for rationale. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-Id: <20200707160613.848843-18-armbru@redhat.com>	6 years ago
Max Reitz	84be629d55	qapi/qnull: Add own header Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-id: 20171114180128.17076-2-mreitz@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>	9 years ago
Markus Armbruster	d2f95f4d48	qapi: Use QNull for a more regular visit_type_null() Make visit_type_null() take an @obj argument like its buddies. This helps keep the next commit simple. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>	9 years ago
Marc-André Lureau	60390d2dc8	qapi: Remove visit_start_alternate() parameter promote_int Before the previous commit, parameter promote_int = true made visit_start_alternate() with an input visitor avoid QTYPE_QINT variants and create QTYPE_QFLOAT variants instead. This was used where QTYPE_QINT variants were invalid. The previous commit fused QTYPE_QINT with QTYPE_QFLOAT, rendering promote_int useless and unused. Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20170607163635.17635-8-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>	9 years ago
Markus Armbruster	4626a19c86	qapi: New QAPI_CLONE_MEMBERS() QAPI_CLONE() returns a newly allocated QAPI object. Inconvenient when we want to clone into an existing object. QAPI_CLONE_MEMBERS() does exactly that. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1493192202-3184-4-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>	9 years ago
Daniel P. Berrange	b3db211f3c	qapi: rename qmp--visitor* to qobject--visitor* The QMP visitors have no direct dependency on QMP. It is valid to use them anywhere that one has a QObject. Rename them to better reflect their functionality as a generic QObject to QAPI converter. This is the first of three parts: rename the files. The next two parts will rename C identifiers. The split is necessary to make git rename detection work. Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [Split into file and identifier rename, two comments touched up] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>	10 years ago
Eric Blake	a15fcc3cf6	qapi: Add new clone visitor We have a couple places in the code base that want to deep-clone one QAPI object into another, and they were resorting to serializing the struct out to QObject then reparsing it. A much more efficient version can be done by adding a new clone visitor. Since cloning is still relatively uncommon, expose the use of the new visitor via a QAPI_CLONE() macro that takes care of type-punning the underlying function pointer, rather than generating lots of unused functions for types that won't be cloned. And yes, we're relying on the compiler treating all pointers equally, even though a strict C program cannot portably do so - but we're not the first one in the qemu code base to expect it to work (hello, glib!). The choice of adding a fourth visitor type deserves some explanation. On the surface, the clone visitor is mostly an input visitor (it takes arbitrary input - in this case, another QAPI object - and creates a new QAPI object during the course of the visit). But ever since commit da72ab0 consolidated enum visits based on the visitor type, using VISITOR_INPUT would cause us to run visit_type_str(), even though for cloning there is nothing to do (we just copy the enum value across, without regards to its mapping to strings). Also, since our input happens to be a QAPI object, we can also satisfy the internal checks for VISITOR_OUTPUT. So in the end, I settled with a new VISITOR_CLONE, and chose its value such that many internal checks can use 'v->type & mask', sticking to 'v->type == value' where the difference matters. Note that we can only clone objects (including alternates) and lists, not built-ins or enums. The visitor core hides integer width from the actual visitor (since commit `04e070d`), and as long as that's the case, we can't clone top-level integers. Then again, those can always be cloned by direct copy, since they are not objects with deep pointers, so it's no real loss. And restricting cloning to just objects and lists is cleaner than restricting it to non-integers. As such, I documented that the clone visitor is for direct use only by code internal to QAPI, and should not be used on incomplete objects (other than a hack to work around the fact that we allow NULL in place of "" in visit_type_str() in other output visitors). Note that as written, the clone visitor will never fail on a complete object. Scalars (including enums) not at the root of the clone copy just fine with no additional effort while visiting the scalar, by virtue of a g_memdup() each time we push another struct onto the stack. Cloning a string requires deduplication of a pointer, which means it can also provide the guarantee of an input visitor of never producing NULL even when still accepting NULL in place of "" the way the QMP output visitor does. Cloning an 'any' type could be possible by incrementing the QObject refcnt, but it's not obvious whether that is better than implementing a QObject deep clone. So for now, we document it as unsupported, and intentionally omit the .type_any() callback to let a developer know their usage needs implementation. Add testsuite coverage for several different clone situations, to ensure that the code is working. I also tested that valgrind was happy with the test. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1465490926-28625-14-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>	10 years ago