riscv/qemu - qemu - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

125630 Commits

68 Branches

448 Tags

581 MiB

Tree: c755f3b959

Commit Graph

Author SHA1 Message Date

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
John Snow	2ddaeb7b09	Python: discourage direct setup.py install When invoking setup.py directly, the default behavior for 'install' is to run the bdist_egg installation hook, which is ... actually deprecated by setuptools. It doesn't seem to work quite right anymore. By contrast, 'pip install' will invoke the bdist_wheel hook instead. This leads to differences in behavior for the two approaches. I advocate using pip in the documentation in this directory, but the 'setup.py' which has been used for quite a long time in the Python world may deceptively appear to work at first glance. Add an error message that will save a bit of time and frustration that points the user towards using the supported installation invocation. Reported-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Beraldo Leal <bleal@redhat.com> Message-id: 20220207213039.2278569-1-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>	4 years ago
John Snow	ea1213b7cc	python: add qemu package installer Add setup.cfg and setup.py, necessary for installing a package via pip. Add a ReST document (PACKAGE.rst) explaining the basics of what this package is for and who to contact for more information. This document will be used as the landing page for the package on PyPI. List the subpackages we intend to package by name instead of using find_namespace because find_namespace will naively also packages tests, things it finds in the dist/ folder, etc. I could not figure out how to modify this behavior; adding allow/deny lists to setuptools kept changing the packaged hierarchy. This works, roll with it. I am not yet using a pyproject.toml style package manifest, because "editable" installs are not defined (yet?) by PEP-517/518. I consider editable installs crucial for development, though they have (apparently) always been somewhat poorly defined. Pip now (19.2 and later) now supports editable installs for projects using pyproject.toml manifests, but might require the use of the --no-use-pep517 flag, which somewhat defeats the point. Full support for setup.py-less editable installs was not introduced until pip 21.1.1: `7a95720e79` For now, while the dust settles, stick with the de-facto setup.py/setup.cfg combination supported by setuptools. It will be worth re-evaluating this point again in the future when our supported build platforms all ship a fairly modern pip. Additional reading on this matter: https://github.com/pypa/packaging-problems/issues/256 https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/6334 https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/6375 https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/6434 https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/6438 Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com> Message-id: 20210527211715.394144-11-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>	5 years ago

John Snow

2ddaeb7b09

Python: discourage direct setup.py install

When invoking setup.py directly, the default behavior for 'install' is
to run the bdist_egg installation hook, which is ... actually deprecated
by setuptools. It doesn't seem to work quite right anymore.

By contrast, 'pip install' will invoke the bdist_wheel hook
instead. This leads to differences in behavior for the two approaches. I
advocate using pip in the documentation in this directory, but the
'setup.py' which has been used for quite a long time in the Python world
may deceptively appear to work at first glance.

Add an error message that will save a bit of time and frustration
that points the user towards using the supported installation
invocation.

Reported-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Beraldo Leal <bleal@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20220207213039.2278569-1-jsnow@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>

4 years ago

John Snow

ea1213b7cc

python: add qemu package installer

Add setup.cfg and setup.py, necessary for installing a package via
pip. Add a ReST document (PACKAGE.rst) explaining the basics of what
this package is for and who to contact for more information. This
document will be used as the landing page for the package on PyPI.

List the subpackages we intend to package by name instead of using
find_namespace because find_namespace will naively also packages tests,
things it finds in the dist/ folder, etc. I could not figure out how to
modify this behavior; adding allow/deny lists to setuptools kept
changing the packaged hierarchy. This works, roll with it.

I am not yet using a pyproject.toml style package manifest, because
"editable" installs are not defined (yet?) by PEP-517/518.

I consider editable installs crucial for development, though they have
(apparently) always been somewhat poorly defined.

Pip now (19.2 and later) now supports editable installs for projects
using pyproject.toml manifests, but might require the use of the
--no-use-pep517 flag, which somewhat defeats the point. Full support for
setup.py-less editable installs was not introduced until pip 21.1.1:
7a95720e79

For now, while the dust settles, stick with the de-facto
setup.py/setup.cfg combination supported by setuptools. It will be worth
re-evaluating this point again in the future when our supported build
platforms all ship a fairly modern pip.

Additional reading on this matter:

https://github.com/pypa/packaging-problems/issues/256
https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/6334
https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/6375
https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/6434
https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/6438

Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20210527211715.394144-11-jsnow@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>

5 years ago

2 Commits (c755f3b95964f344806fa8e6a6e05ffc3ee1c4fa)