riscv/qemu - qemu - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Markus Armbruster	87c16dceca	qapi: Back out doc comments added just to please qapi.py This reverts commit 3313b61's changes to tests/qapi-schema/, except for tests/qapi-schema/doc-*. We could keep some of these doc comments to serve as positive test cases. However, they don't actually add to what we get from doc comment use in actual schemas, as we we don't test output matches expectations, and don't systematically cover doc comment features. Proper positive test coverage would be nice. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-4-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>	9 years ago
Marc-André Lureau	3313b6124b	qapi: add qapi2texi script As the name suggests, the qapi2texi script converts JSON QAPI description into a texi file suitable for different target formats (info/man/txt/pdf/html...). It parses the following kind of blocks: Free-form: ## # = Section # == Subsection # # Some text foo with emphasis # 1. with a list # 2. like that # # And some code: # \| $ echo foo # \| -> do this # \| <- get that # ## Symbol description: ## # @symbol: # # Symbol body ditto ergo sum. Foo bar # baz ding. # # @param1: the frob to frobnicate # @param2: #optional how hard to frobnicate # # Returns: the frobnicated frob. # If frob isn't frobnicatable, GenericError. # # Since: version # Notes: notes, comments can have # - itemized list # - like this # # Example: # # -> { "execute": "quit" } # <- { "return": {} } # ## That's roughly following the following EBNF grammar: api_comment = "##\n" comment "##\n" comment = freeform_comment \| symbol_comment freeform_comment = { "# " text "\n" \| "#\n" } symbol_comment = "# @" name ":\n" { member \| tag_section \| freeform_comment } member = "# @" name ':' [ text ] "\n" freeform_comment tag_section = "# " ( "Returns:", "Since:", "Note:", "Notes:", "Example:", "Examples:" ) [ text ] "\n" freeform_comment text = free text with markup Note that the grammar is ambiguous: a line "# @foo:\n" can be parsed both as freeform_comment and as symbol_comment. The actual parser recognizes symbol_comment. See docs/qapi-code-gen.txt for more details. Deficiencies and limitations: - the generated QMP documentation includes internal types - union type support is lacking - type information is lacking in generated documentation - doc comment error message positions are imprecise, they point to the beginning of the comment. - a few minor issues, all marked TODO/FIXME in the code Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20170113144135.5150-16-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [test-qapi.py tweaked to avoid trailing empty lines in .out] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>	9 years ago
Eric Blake	d220fbcd1d	qapi: Test for various name collisions Expose some weaknesses in the generator: we don't always forbid the generation of structs that contain multiple members that map to the same C or QMP name. This has already been marked FIXME in qapi.py in commit `d90675f`, but having more tests will make sure future patches produce desired behavior; and updating existing patches to better document things doesn't hurt, either. Some of these collisions are already caught in the old-style parser checks, but ultimately we want all collisions to be caught in the new-style QAPISchema*.check() methods. This patch focuses on C struct members, and does not consider collisions between commands and events (affecting C function names), or even collisions between generated C type names with user type names (for things like automatic FOOList struct representing array types or FOOKind for an implicit enum). There are two types of struct collisions we want to catch: 1) Collision between two keys in a JSON object. qapi.py prevents that within a single struct (see test duplicate-key), but it is possible to have collisions between a type's members and its base type's members (existing tests struct-base-clash, struct-base-clash-deep), and its flat union variant members (renamed test flat-union-clash-member). 2) Collision between two members of the C struct that is generated for a given QAPI type: a) Multiple QAPI names map to the same C name (new test args-name-clash) b) A QAPI name maps to a C name that is used for another purpose (new tests flat-union-clash-branch, struct-base-clash-base, union-clash-data). We already fixed some such cases in commit `0f61af3e` and `1e6c1616`, but more remain. c) Two C names generated for other purposes clash (updated test alternate-clash, new test union-clash-branches, union-clash-type, flat-union-clash-type) Ultimately, if we need to have a flat union where a tag value clashes with a base member name, we could change the generator to name the union (using 'foo.u.value' rather than 'foo.value') or otherwise munge the C name corresponding to tag values. But unless such a need arises, it will probably be easier to just forbid these collisions. Some of these negative tests will be deleted later, and positive tests added to qapi-schema-test.json in their place, when the generator code is reworked to avoid particular code generation collisions in class 2). [Note that viewing this patch with git rename detection enabled may see some confusion due to renaming some tests while adding others, but where the content is similar enough that git picks the wrong pre- and post-patch files to associate] Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Improve commit message and comments a bit, drop an unrelated test] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>	11 years ago
Eric Blake	ff55d72eaf	qapi: Check for member name conflicts with a base class Our type inheritance for both 'struct' and for flat 'union' merges key/value pairs from the base class with those from the type in question. Although the C code currently boxes things so that there is a distinction between which member is referred to, the QMP wire format does not allow passing a key more than once in a single object. Besides, if we ever change the generated C code to not be quite so boxy, we'd want to avoid duplicate member names there, too. Fix a testsuite entry added in an earlier patch, as well as adding a couple more tests to ensure we have appropriate coverage. Ensure that collisions are detected, regardless of whether there is a difference in opinion on whether the member name is optional. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>	11 years ago