riscv/qemu - qemu - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

102941 Commits

68 Branches

448 Tags

581 MiB

Tree: a342ce9dfe

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Alex Bennée	899c3fc2dc	scripts/coverage: initial coverage comparison script This is a very rough and ready first pass at comparing gcovr's json output between two different runs. At the moment it will give you a file level diff between two runs but hopefully it wont be too hard to extend to give better insight. After generating the coverage results you run with something like: ./scripts/coverage/compare_gcov_json.py \ -a ./builds/gcov.config1/coverage.json \ -b ./builds/gcov.config2/coverage.json My hope is we can use this to remove some redundancy from testing as well as evaluate if new tests are actually providing additional coverage or just burning our precious CI time. Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Cc: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20230403134920.2132362-2-alex.bennee@linaro.org>	3 years ago

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Alex Bennée

899c3fc2dc

scripts/coverage: initial coverage comparison script

This is a very rough and ready first pass at comparing gcovr's json
output between two different runs. At the moment it will give you a
file level diff between two runs but hopefully it wont be too hard to
extend to give better insight.

After generating the coverage results you run with something like:

  ./scripts/coverage/compare_gcov_json.py \
    -a ./builds/gcov.config1/coverage.json \
    -b ./builds/gcov.config2/coverage.json

My hope is we can use this to remove some redundancy from testing as
well as evaluate if new tests are actually providing additional
coverage or just burning our precious CI time.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230403134920.2132362-2-alex.bennee@linaro.org>

3 years ago

1 Commits (a342ce9dfeed8088c426e5d51d4a7e47f3764b84)