riscv/qemu - qemu - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
John Snow	37094b6dd5	python: rename qemu.aqmp to qemu.qmp Now that we are fully switched over to the new QMP library, move it back over the old namespace. This is being done primarily so that we may upload this package simply as "qemu.qmp" without introducing confusion over whether or not "aqmp" is a new protocol or not. The trade-off is increased confusion inside the QEMU developer tree. Sorry! Note: the 'private' member "_aqmp" in legacy.py also changes to "_qmp"; not out of necessity, but just to remove any traces of the "aqmp" name. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Beraldo Leal <bleal@redhat.com> Acked-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@openvz.org> Message-id: 20220330172812.3427355-8-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>	4 years ago
John Snow	481607c7d3	python/aqmp: add start_server() and accept() methods Add start_server() and accept() methods that can be used instead of start_server_and_accept() to allow more fine-grained control over the incoming connection process. (Eagle-eyed reviewers will surely notice that it's a bit weird that "CONNECTING" is a state that's shared between both the start_server() and connect() states. That's absolutely true, and it's very true that checking on the presence of _accepted as an indicator of state is a hack. That's also very certainly true. But ... this keeps client code an awful lot simpler, as it doesn't have to care exactly how the connection is being made, just that it is. Is it worth disrupting that simplicity in order to provide a better state guard on `accept()`? Hm.) Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Message-id: 20220225205948.3693480-9-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>	4 years ago
John Snow	5e9902a030	python/aqmp: refactor _do_accept() into two distinct steps Refactor _do_accept() into _do_start_server() and _do_accept(). As of this commit, the former calls the latter, but in subsequent commits they'll be split apart. (So please forgive the misnomer for _do_start_server(); it will live up to its name shortly, and the docstring will be updated then too. I'm just cutting down on some churn.) Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Message-id: 20220225205948.3693480-7-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>	4 years ago
John Snow	68a6cf3ffe	python/aqmp: remove _new_session and _establish_connection These two methods attempted to entirely envelop the logic of establishing a connection to a peer start to finish. However, we need to break apart the incoming connection step into more granular steps. We will no longer be able to reasonably constrain the logic inside of these helper functions. So, remove them - with _session_guard(), they no longer serve a real purpose. Although the public API doesn't change, the internal API does. Now that there are no intermediary methods between e.g. connect() and _do_connect(), there's no hook where the runstate is set. As a result, the test suite changes a little to cope with the new semantics of _do_accept() and _do_connect(). Lastly, take some pieces of the now-deleted docstrings and move them up to the public interface level. They were a little more detailed, and it won't hurt to keep them. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Message-id: 20220225205948.3693480-4-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>	4 years ago
John Snow	0ba4e76b23	python/aqmp: rename 'accept()' to 'start_server_and_accept()' Previously, I had a method named "accept()" that under-the-hood calls bind(2), listen(2) and accept(2). I meant this as a simplification and counterpart to the one-shot "connect()" method. This is confusing to readers who expect accept() to mean just accept(2). Since I need to split apart the "accept()" method into multiple methods anyway (one of which strongly resembling accept(2)), it feels pertinent to rename this method now. Rename this all-in-one method "start_server_and_accept()" instead. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Message-id: 20220225205948.3693480-3-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>	4 years ago
John Snow	8193b9d148	python/aqmp: add LineProtocol tests Tests a real connect, a real accept, and really sending and receiving a message over a UNIX socket. Brings coverage of protocol.py up to ~93%. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Message-id: 20210915162955.333025-27-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>	5 years ago
John Snow	a1f71b61ea	python/aqmp: add AsyncProtocol unit tests This tests most of protocol.py -- From a hacked up Coverage.py run, it's at about 86%. There's a few error cases that aren't very well tested yet, they're hard to induce artificially so far. I'm working on it. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Message-id: 20210915162955.333025-26-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>	5 years ago