riscv/qemu - qemu - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

92272 Commits

68 Branches

448 Tags

581 MiB

Tree: 5dce7b8d8c

Commit Graph

Author SHA1 Message Date

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Markus Armbruster	352ada9ad4	tests/qapi-schema: Delete two redundant tests Tests duplicate-key and double-data test the same thing. The former predates the latter, and it has a better name. Delete the latter, and tweak the former's comment. Tests include-format-err and include-extra-junk test the same thing. The former predates the latter, but the latter has a better name and a comment. Delete the former. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-3-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>	7 years ago
Eric Blake	d220fbcd1d	qapi: Test for various name collisions Expose some weaknesses in the generator: we don't always forbid the generation of structs that contain multiple members that map to the same C or QMP name. This has already been marked FIXME in qapi.py in commit `d90675f`, but having more tests will make sure future patches produce desired behavior; and updating existing patches to better document things doesn't hurt, either. Some of these collisions are already caught in the old-style parser checks, but ultimately we want all collisions to be caught in the new-style QAPISchema*.check() methods. This patch focuses on C struct members, and does not consider collisions between commands and events (affecting C function names), or even collisions between generated C type names with user type names (for things like automatic FOOList struct representing array types or FOOKind for an implicit enum). There are two types of struct collisions we want to catch: 1) Collision between two keys in a JSON object. qapi.py prevents that within a single struct (see test duplicate-key), but it is possible to have collisions between a type's members and its base type's members (existing tests struct-base-clash, struct-base-clash-deep), and its flat union variant members (renamed test flat-union-clash-member). 2) Collision between two members of the C struct that is generated for a given QAPI type: a) Multiple QAPI names map to the same C name (new test args-name-clash) b) A QAPI name maps to a C name that is used for another purpose (new tests flat-union-clash-branch, struct-base-clash-base, union-clash-data). We already fixed some such cases in commit `0f61af3e` and `1e6c1616`, but more remain. c) Two C names generated for other purposes clash (updated test alternate-clash, new test union-clash-branches, union-clash-type, flat-union-clash-type) Ultimately, if we need to have a flat union where a tag value clashes with a base member name, we could change the generator to name the union (using 'foo.u.value' rather than 'foo.value') or otherwise munge the C name corresponding to tag values. But unless such a need arises, it will probably be easier to just forbid these collisions. Some of these negative tests will be deleted later, and positive tests added to qapi-schema-test.json in their place, when the generator code is reworked to avoid particular code generation collisions in class 2). [Note that viewing this patch with git rename detection enabled may see some confusion due to renaming some tests while adding others, but where the content is similar enough that git picks the wrong pre- and post-patch files to associate] Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Improve commit message and comments a bit, drop an unrelated test] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>	11 years ago
Wenchao Xia	4b35991a3b	qapi script: add check for duplicated key It is bad that same key was specified twice, especially when a union has two branches with same condition. This patch can prevent it. Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia <wenchaoqemu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>	12 years ago

Markus Armbruster

352ada9ad4

tests/qapi-schema: Delete two redundant tests

Tests duplicate-key and double-data test the same thing.  The former
predates the latter, and it has a better name.  Delete the latter, and
tweak the former's comment.

Tests include-format-err and include-extra-junk test the same thing.
The former predates the latter, but the latter has a better name and a
comment.  Delete the former.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

7 years ago

Eric Blake

d220fbcd1d

qapi: Test for various name collisions

Expose some weaknesses in the generator: we don't always forbid
the generation of structs that contain multiple members that map
to the same C or QMP name.  This has already been marked FIXME in
qapi.py in commit d90675f, but having more tests will make sure
future patches produce desired behavior; and updating existing
patches to better document things doesn't hurt, either.  Some of
these collisions are already caught in the old-style parser
checks, but ultimately we want all collisions to be caught in the
new-style QAPISchema*.check() methods.

This patch focuses on C struct members, and does not consider
collisions between commands and events (affecting C function
names), or even collisions between generated C type names with
user type names (for things like automatic FOOList struct
representing array types or FOOKind for an implicit enum).

There are two types of struct collisions we want to catch:
 1) Collision between two keys in a JSON object. qapi.py prevents
    that within a single struct (see test duplicate-key), but it is
    possible to have collisions between a type's members and its
    base type's members (existing tests struct-base-clash,
    struct-base-clash-deep), and its flat union variant members
    (renamed test flat-union-clash-member).
 2) Collision between two members of the C struct that is generated
    for a given QAPI type:
    a) Multiple QAPI names map to the same C name (new test
       args-name-clash)
    b) A QAPI name maps to a C name that is used for another purpose
       (new tests flat-union-clash-branch, struct-base-clash-base,
       union-clash-data). We already fixed some such cases in commit
       0f61af3e and 1e6c1616, but more remain.
    c) Two C names generated for other purposes clash
       (updated test alternate-clash, new test union-clash-branches,
       union-clash-type, flat-union-clash-type)

Ultimately, if we need to have a flat union where a tag value
clashes with a base member name, we could change the generator to
name the union (using 'foo.u.value' rather than 'foo.value') or
otherwise munge the C name corresponding to tag values.  But
unless such a need arises, it will probably be easier to just
forbid these collisions.

Some of these negative tests will be deleted later, and positive
tests added to qapi-schema-test.json in their place, when the
generator code is reworked to avoid particular code generation
collisions in class 2).

[Note that viewing this patch with git rename detection enabled
may see some confusion due to renaming some tests while adding
others, but where the content is similar enough that git picks
the wrong pre- and post-patch files to associate]

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Improve commit message and comments a bit, drop an unrelated test]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

11 years ago

Wenchao Xia

4b35991a3b

qapi script: add check for duplicated key

It is bad that same key was specified twice, especially when a union has
two branches with same condition. This patch can prevent it.

Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia <wenchaoqemu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>

12 years ago

3 Commits (5dce7b8d8ce6f397a2f2e46c236cc102d4e7a585)