Browse Source
With the help of some Limoncino I noted several aspects of the QEMU coding style, particularly where it differs from the Linux coding style as many contributors work on both projects. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@6976 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162stable-0.11
1 changed files with 78 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ |
|||
Qemu Coding Style |
|||
================= |
|||
|
|||
1. Whitespace |
|||
|
|||
Of course, the most important aspect in any coding style is whitespace. |
|||
Crusty old coders who have trouble spotting the glasses on their noses |
|||
can tell the difference between a tab and eight spaces from a distance |
|||
of approximately fifteen parsecs. Many a flamewar have been fought and |
|||
lost on this issue. |
|||
|
|||
QEMU indents are four spaces. Tabs are never used, except in Makefiles |
|||
where they have been irreversibly coded into the syntax by some moron. |
|||
Spaces of course are superior to tabs because: |
|||
|
|||
- You have just one way to specify whitespace, not two. Ambiguity breeds |
|||
mistakes. |
|||
- The confusion surrounding 'use tabs to indent, spaces to justify' is gone. |
|||
- Tab indents push your code to the right, making your screen seriously |
|||
unbalanced. |
|||
- Tabs will be rendered incorrectly on editors who are misconfigured not |
|||
to use tab stops of eight positions. |
|||
- Tabs are rendered badly in patches, causing off-by-one errors in almost |
|||
every line. |
|||
- It is the QEMU coding style. |
|||
|
|||
Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines. |
|||
|
|||
2. Line width |
|||
|
|||
Lines are 80 characters; not longer. |
|||
|
|||
Rationale: |
|||
- Some people like to tile their 24" screens with a 6x4 matrix of 80x24 |
|||
xterms and use vi in all of them. The best way to punish them is to |
|||
let them keep doing it. |
|||
- Code and especially patches is much more readable if limited to a sane |
|||
line length. Eighty is traditional. |
|||
- It is the QEMU coding style. |
|||
|
|||
3. Naming |
|||
|
|||
Variables are lower_case_with_underscores; easy to type and read. Structured |
|||
type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out. Scalar type |
|||
names are lower_case_with_underscores_ending_with_a_t, like the POSIX |
|||
uint64_t and family. Note that this last convention contradicts POSIX |
|||
and is therefore likely to be changed. |
|||
|
|||
Typedefs are used to eliminate the redundant 'struct' keyword. It is the |
|||
QEMU coding style. |
|||
|
|||
4. Block structure |
|||
|
|||
Every indented statement is braced; even if the block contains just one |
|||
statement. The opening brace is on the line that contains the control |
|||
flow statement that introduces the new block; the closing brace is on the |
|||
same line as the else keyword, or on a line by itself if there is no else |
|||
keyword. Example: |
|||
|
|||
if (a == 5) { |
|||
printf("a was 5.\n"); |
|||
} else if (a == 6) { |
|||
printf("a was 6.\n"); |
|||
} else { |
|||
printf("a was something else entirely.\n"); |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
An exception is the opening brace for a function; for reasons of tradition |
|||
and clarity it comes on a line by itself: |
|||
|
|||
void a_function(void) |
|||
{ |
|||
do_something(); |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
Rationale: a consistent (except for functions...) bracing style reduces |
|||
ambiguity and avoids needless churn when lines are added or removed. |
|||
Furthermore, it is the QEMU coding style. |
|||
Loading…
Reference in new issue