Browse Source

aio: support G_IO_HUP and G_IO_ERR

aio-posix.c could not take advantage of G_IO_HUP and G_IO_ERR because
select(2) does not have equivalent events.  Now that g_poll(3) is used
we can support G_IO_HUP and G_IO_ERR.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1361356113-11049-11-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
pull/2/head
Stefan Hajnoczi 14 years ago
committed by Anthony Liguori
parent
commit
b5a01a70ad
  1. 12
      aio-posix.c

12
aio-posix.c

@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ void aio_set_fd_handler(AioContext *ctx,
node->opaque = opaque;
node->pollfds_idx = -1;
node->pfd.events = (io_read ? G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP : 0);
node->pfd.events |= (io_write ? G_IO_OUT : 0);
node->pfd.events = (io_read ? G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP | G_IO_ERR : 0);
node->pfd.events |= (io_write ? G_IO_OUT | G_IO_ERR : 0);
}
aio_notify(ctx);
@ -112,13 +112,6 @@ bool aio_pending(AioContext *ctx)
QLIST_FOREACH(node, &ctx->aio_handlers, node) {
int revents;
/*
* FIXME: right now we cannot get G_IO_HUP and G_IO_ERR because
* main-loop.c is still select based (due to the slirp legacy).
* If main-loop.c ever switches to poll, G_IO_ERR should be
* tested too. Dispatching G_IO_ERR to both handlers should be
* okay, since handlers need to be ready for spurious wakeups.
*/
revents = node->pfd.revents & node->pfd.events;
if (revents & (G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP | G_IO_ERR) && node->io_read) {
return true;
@ -150,7 +143,6 @@ static bool aio_dispatch(AioContext *ctx)
revents = node->pfd.revents & node->pfd.events;
node->pfd.revents = 0;
/* See comment in aio_pending. */
if (!node->deleted &&
(revents & (G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP | G_IO_ERR)) &&
node->io_read) {

Loading…
Cancel
Save