Browse Source
Use the futex-based implementation of QemuEvent on Windows to remove code duplication and remove the overhead of event object construction and destruction. Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250526-event-v4-6-5b784cc8e1de@daynix.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>pull/287/head
committed by
Paolo Bonzini
7 changed files with 182 additions and 315 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ |
|||
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ |
|||
|
|||
#include "qemu/osdep.h" |
|||
#include "qemu/thread.h" |
|||
|
|||
/*
|
|||
* Valid transitions: |
|||
* - FREE -> SET (qemu_event_set) |
|||
* - BUSY -> SET (qemu_event_set) |
|||
* - SET -> FREE (qemu_event_reset) |
|||
* - FREE -> BUSY (qemu_event_wait) |
|||
* |
|||
* With futex, the waking and blocking operations follow |
|||
* BUSY -> SET and FREE -> BUSY, respectively. |
|||
* |
|||
* Without futex, BUSY -> SET and FREE -> BUSY never happen. Instead, the waking |
|||
* operation follows FREE -> SET and the blocking operation will happen in |
|||
* qemu_event_wait() if the event is not SET. |
|||
* |
|||
* SET->BUSY does not happen (it can be observed from the outside but |
|||
* it really is SET->FREE->BUSY). |
|||
* |
|||
* busy->free provably cannot happen; to enforce it, the set->free transition |
|||
* is done with an OR, which becomes a no-op if the event has concurrently |
|||
* transitioned to free or busy. |
|||
*/ |
|||
|
|||
#define EV_SET 0 |
|||
#define EV_FREE 1 |
|||
#define EV_BUSY -1 |
|||
|
|||
void qemu_event_init(QemuEvent *ev, bool init) |
|||
{ |
|||
#ifndef HAVE_FUTEX |
|||
pthread_mutex_init(&ev->lock, NULL); |
|||
pthread_cond_init(&ev->cond, NULL); |
|||
#endif |
|||
|
|||
ev->value = (init ? EV_SET : EV_FREE); |
|||
ev->initialized = true; |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
void qemu_event_destroy(QemuEvent *ev) |
|||
{ |
|||
assert(ev->initialized); |
|||
ev->initialized = false; |
|||
#ifndef HAVE_FUTEX |
|||
pthread_mutex_destroy(&ev->lock); |
|||
pthread_cond_destroy(&ev->cond); |
|||
#endif |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
void qemu_event_set(QemuEvent *ev) |
|||
{ |
|||
assert(ev->initialized); |
|||
|
|||
#ifdef HAVE_FUTEX |
|||
/*
|
|||
* Pairs with both qemu_event_reset() and qemu_event_wait(). |
|||
* |
|||
* qemu_event_set has release semantics, but because it *loads* |
|||
* ev->value we need a full memory barrier here. |
|||
*/ |
|||
smp_mb(); |
|||
if (qatomic_read(&ev->value) != EV_SET) { |
|||
int old = qatomic_xchg(&ev->value, EV_SET); |
|||
|
|||
/* Pairs with memory barrier in kernel futex_wait system call. */ |
|||
smp_mb__after_rmw(); |
|||
if (old == EV_BUSY) { |
|||
/* There were waiters, wake them up. */ |
|||
qemu_futex_wake_all(ev); |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
#else |
|||
pthread_mutex_lock(&ev->lock); |
|||
/* Pairs with qemu_event_reset()'s load acquire. */ |
|||
qatomic_store_release(&ev->value, EV_SET); |
|||
pthread_cond_broadcast(&ev->cond); |
|||
pthread_mutex_unlock(&ev->lock); |
|||
#endif |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
void qemu_event_reset(QemuEvent *ev) |
|||
{ |
|||
assert(ev->initialized); |
|||
|
|||
#ifdef HAVE_FUTEX |
|||
/*
|
|||
* If there was a concurrent reset (or even reset+wait), |
|||
* do nothing. Otherwise change EV_SET->EV_FREE. |
|||
*/ |
|||
qatomic_or(&ev->value, EV_FREE); |
|||
|
|||
/*
|
|||
* Order reset before checking the condition in the caller. |
|||
* Pairs with the first memory barrier in qemu_event_set(). |
|||
*/ |
|||
smp_mb__after_rmw(); |
|||
#else |
|||
/*
|
|||
* If futexes are not available, there are no EV_FREE->EV_BUSY |
|||
* transitions because wakeups are done entirely through the |
|||
* condition variable. Since qatomic_set() only writes EV_FREE, |
|||
* the load seems useless but in reality, the acquire synchronizes |
|||
* with qemu_event_set()'s store release: if qemu_event_reset() |
|||
* sees EV_SET here, then the caller will certainly see a |
|||
* successful condition and skip qemu_event_wait(): |
|||
* |
|||
* done = 1; if (done == 0) |
|||
* qemu_event_set() { qemu_event_reset() { |
|||
* lock(); |
|||
* ev->value = EV_SET -----> load ev->value |
|||
* ev->value = old value | EV_FREE |
|||
* cond_broadcast() |
|||
* unlock(); } |
|||
* } if (done == 0) |
|||
* // qemu_event_wait() not called
|
|||
*/ |
|||
qatomic_set(&ev->value, qatomic_load_acquire(&ev->value) | EV_FREE); |
|||
#endif |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
void qemu_event_wait(QemuEvent *ev) |
|||
{ |
|||
assert(ev->initialized); |
|||
|
|||
#ifdef HAVE_FUTEX |
|||
while (true) { |
|||
/*
|
|||
* qemu_event_wait must synchronize with qemu_event_set even if it does |
|||
* not go down the slow path, so this load-acquire is needed that |
|||
* synchronizes with the first memory barrier in qemu_event_set(). |
|||
*/ |
|||
unsigned value = qatomic_load_acquire(&ev->value); |
|||
if (value == EV_SET) { |
|||
break; |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
if (value == EV_FREE) { |
|||
/*
|
|||
* Leave the event reset and tell qemu_event_set that there are |
|||
* waiters. No need to retry, because there cannot be a concurrent |
|||
* busy->free transition. After the CAS, the event will be either |
|||
* set or busy. |
|||
* |
|||
* This cmpxchg doesn't have particular ordering requirements if it |
|||
* succeeds (moving the store earlier can only cause |
|||
* qemu_event_set() to issue _more_ wakeups), the failing case needs |
|||
* acquire semantics like the load above. |
|||
*/ |
|||
if (qatomic_cmpxchg(&ev->value, EV_FREE, EV_BUSY) == EV_SET) { |
|||
break; |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
/*
|
|||
* This is the final check for a concurrent set, so it does need |
|||
* a smp_mb() pairing with the second barrier of qemu_event_set(). |
|||
* The barrier is inside the FUTEX_WAIT system call. |
|||
*/ |
|||
qemu_futex_wait(ev, EV_BUSY); |
|||
} |
|||
#else |
|||
pthread_mutex_lock(&ev->lock); |
|||
while (qatomic_read(&ev->value) != EV_SET) { |
|||
pthread_cond_wait(&ev->cond, &ev->lock); |
|||
} |
|||
pthread_mutex_unlock(&ev->lock); |
|||
#endif |
|||
} |
|||
Loading…
Reference in new issue