riscv/musl - musl - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
rofl0r	8d2887f884	fcntl.h: O_SEARCH was missing for powerpc put some macros that do not differ between architectures in the main header and remove from bits. restructure mips header so it has the same structure as the others.	14 years ago
Rich Felker	dde325d7b3	fix struct stat size/padding on microblaze	14 years ago
Rich Felker	25011215be	inline syscalls for microblaze	14 years ago
Rich Felker	64251d8bbd	better support for reverse-endian variants of arm/mips/microblaze these macros are supported by more compilers	14 years ago
Rich Felker	21284ec75d	microblaze TLS relocation support, completely untested	14 years ago
Rich Felker	9ec4283b28	add support for TLS variant I, presently needed for arm and mips despite documentation that makes it sound a lot different, the only ABI-constraint difference between TLS variants II and I seems to be that variant II stores the initial TLS segment immediately below the thread pointer (i.e. the thread pointer points to the end of it) and variant I stores the initial TLS segment above the thread pointer, requiring the thread descriptor to be stored below. the actual value stored in the thread pointer register also tends to have per-arch random offsets applied to it for silly micro-optimization purposes. with these changes applied, TLS should be basically working on all supported archs except microblaze. I'm still working on getting the necessary information and a working toolchain that can build TLS binaries for microblaze, but in theory, static-linked programs with TLS and dynamic-linked programs where only the main executable uses TLS should already work on microblaze. alignment constraints have not yet been heavily tested, so it's possible that this code does not always align TLS segments correctly on archs that need TLS variant I.	14 years ago
Rich Felker	9c74856af7	dynamic-linked TLS support for everything but dlopen'd libs currently, only i386 is tested. x86_64 and arm should probably work. the necessary relocation types for mips and microblaze have not been added because I don't understand how they're supposed to work, and I'm not even sure if it's defined yet on microblaze. I may be able to reverse engineer the requirements out of gcc/binutils output.	14 years ago
Rich Felker	8c0a3d9e5c	microblaze port based on initial work by rdp, with heavy modifications. some features including threads are untested because qemu app-level emulation seems to be broken and I do not have a proper system image for testing.	14 years ago

1 2