binutils-gdb

Tree: f9b7cc0cd2

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Sam James	f9b7cc0cd2	contrib: sync dg-extract-results.sh with GCC This syncs dg-extract-results.sh with GCC. It contains two commits: r14-4333-g346f5991569fae and r14-9393-g64273a7e6bd8ba. contrib/ChangeLog: * dg-extract-results.sh: Sync with GCC. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>	2 years ago
Sam James	a02a739070	contrib: sync dg-extract-results.py with GCC This syncs dg-extract-results.py with GCC. It contains only one commit: r14-7145-g8f67953d0198fe. contrib/ChangeLog: * dg-extract-results.py: Sync with GCC. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>	2 years ago
Simon Marchi	ee1b8b9477	Import mklog.py from gcc repo I've been using the mklog utility from the gcc repo for a while to generate skeleton of ChangeLog entries. It recently got a rewrite as a Python script. Unfortunately, to find the repository root, and eventually to find in which ChangeLog file each entry goes, the new script assumes it is located in the same git repository that it generates ChangeLog entries for. This means that if you make a change in the gcc source tree and run mklog.py from that same source tree, it works. But if you make changes in your ~/src/binutils-gdb tree and run ~/src/gcc/contrib/mklog.py, it won't work. IIRC, the old script required that you ran it with the project's root directory as the CWD. The simplest way to fix this is to import the script in binutils-gdb and use it from there. It's also nice because we can use it without having a clone of the gcc repo. I also thought of adding a "--root" switch to the script to override the project's base directory. However: 1) It is more work. 2) If the script still lives in the gcc repo, it's less convenient than having it in binutils-gdb. This patch imports contrib/mklog.py from the gcc repo, revision c560591408440f441b8b327f5b41f9328d20b67b. contrib/ChangeLog: * mklog.py: New file, imported from gcc. Note: the ChangeLog entry above was generated using `git show \| ./mklog.py`! Change-Id: I955592ce6397681986dc82a09593c32d8b8de54f	6 years ago
Andrew Burgess	c959562d9b	contrib: Update dg-extract-results.* from gcc Pull the latest version of the dg-extract-results.* scripts from the gcc repository. This picks up this commit from gcc: commit c9a41202b272b0b3a3c64a96ef4a5a97579eb017 Date: Mon May 11 22:32:35 2020 +0100 contrib: Handle GDB specific test result types This commit is for the benefit of GDB, but as the binutils-gdb repository shares the contrib/ directory with gcc, this commit must first be applied to gcc then copied back to binutils-gdb. This commit extends the two scripts contrib/dg-extract-results.{py,sh} to handle some new, GDB specific test result types. These test results types should never appear in GCC, or any other tool that shares the contrib/ directly, so this change should be harmless. In this patch series: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-April/167847.html changes were made in GDB's use of Dejagnu so that two additional conditions could be detected, these are: 1. Test names that contain either the build or source paths. Such test names make it difficult to compare the results of two test runs of GDB from two different directories, and 2. Duplicate test names. Duplicates make it difficult to track down exactly which test has failed. When running Dejagnu on GDB we can now (sometimes) see two additional test result types matching the above conditions, these are '# of paths in test names' and '# of duplicate test names'. If the test is run in parallel mode (make -j...) then these extra test results will appear in the individual test summary files, but are not merged into the final summary file. Additionally, within the summary file there are now two new types of test summary line, these are 'PATH: ...' and 'DUPLICATE: ...', these allow users to quickly search the test summary to track down where the offending test names are. These lines are similarly not merged into the unified gdb.sum file after a parallel test run. This commit extends the dg-extract-results.* scripts to calculate the totals for the two new result types, and to copy the new test summary lines into the unified summary file. contrib/ChangeLog: * dg-extract-results.py: Update from gcc repo. * dg-extract-results.sh: Likewise.	6 years ago
Andrew Burgess	66b92822fa	contrib: Update dg-extract-results.* from gcc The dg-extract-results scripts have been updated in the gcc repository. This commit copies the updated versions of the scripts in to the binutils-gdb repository. There are two changes, these are: 1. Improved detection of timeout lines, though I suspect this only applies to gcc results, and 2. Detection of KPASS results, this is of interest to gdb, where these results would not be included in the final .sum file. A grep over binutils-gdb shows the dg-extract-results is not used by ld, gas, or binutils, however I tested these anyway and saw no changes in the final .sum files (tested on x86-64 GNU/Linux). On gdb when running tests in parallel dg-extract-results is used, and the final .sum file now includes the KPASS results. contrib/ChangeLog: * dg-extract-results.py: Update from gcc repo. * dg-extract-results.sh: Likewise. Change-Id: I54abd07f4e8f5cf88a6db74519674f6939860157	7 years ago
Rainer Orth	5a6996172e	Update dg-extract-results.* from gcc When looking at the gdb.sum file produced by dg-extract-results.sh on Solaris 11/x86, I noticed some wrong sorting, like this: PASS: gdb.ada/addr_arith.exp: print something'address + 0 PASS: gdb.ada/addr_arith.exp: print 0 + something'address PASS: gdb.ada/addr_arith.exp: print something'address - 0 PASS: gdb.ada/addr_arith.exp: print 0 - something'address Looking closer, I noticed that while dg-extract-results.sh had been copied over from contrib in the gcc repo, the corresponding dg-extract-results.py file had not. The latter not only fixes the sorting problem I'd observed, but is also way faster than the shell version (like a factor of 50 faster). Therefore I propose to update both files from the gcc repo. The changes to the .sh version are trivial, just counting the number of DejaGnu ERROR lines, too. The files are moved to toplevel contrib: * This way, they can easily be used should someone decide to parallelize one or more of the binutils, gas, or ld testsuites. * They are less easily overlooked for updates from the gcc repo when they reside in the same place in both. * The test_summary script needs to live in contrib since the toplevel Makefile's mail-report.log target expects it there. Tested on amd64-pc-solaris2.11 with make -j16 check and make -j16 -k RACY_ITER=5 check gdb/testsuite: * dg-extract-results.sh: Move to toplevel contrib. * Makefile.in (check-parallel): Reflect dg-extract-results.sh move. * Makefile.in (check-parallel-racy): Likewise. contrib: * dg-extract-results.sh: Move from gdb/testsuite. Update from gcc repo. * dg-extract-results.py: New from gcc repo.	8 years ago
Ben Elliston	962c9e742f	* contrib: Remove directory.	20 years ago
Nick Clifton	1dfa8174b2	New directory. Created to contain a copy of the texi2pod.pl script so that it is in the same place as the version in the FSF GCC sources.	24 years ago

8 Commits (f9b7cc0cd2a1699c5cb7d5b159c8392e6973663c)