Browse Source

testsuite, gdb.btrace: pass rn-dl-bind.exp with clang

Clang generates slightly different debug information causing
gdb.btrace/rn-dl-bind.exp to fail on its way to the actual test.

Modify the test to remove that dependency.
binutils-2_37-branch
Markus Metzger 6 years ago
parent
commit
f0778fc1cf
  1. 5
      gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
  2. 28
      gdb/testsuite/gdb.btrace/rn-dl-bind.exp

5
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2021-03-03 Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
* gdb.btrace/rn-dl-bind.exp: Replace reverse-step with
reverse-continue to breakpoint.
2021-03-03 Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
* gdb.btrace/delta.exp: Remove instruction-history and

28
gdb/testsuite/gdb.btrace/rn-dl-bind.exp

@ -38,18 +38,28 @@ if ![runto_main] {
# trace the code for the call to test
gdb_test_no_output "record btrace"
gdb_test "next" ".*main\.2.*" "next.1"
gdb_test "next" ".*main\.2.*"
# just dump the function-call-history to help debugging
gdb_test_no_output "set record function-call-history-size 0"
gdb_test "record function-call-history /cli 1" ".*"
# check that we can reverse-next and next
gdb_test "reverse-next" ".*main\.1.*" "reverse-next.1"
gdb_test "next" ".*main\.2.*" "next.2"
# now go into test and try to reverse-next and next over the library call
gdb_test "reverse-step" ".*test\.3.*" "reverse-step.1"
gdb_test "reverse-step" ".*test\.2.*" "reverse-step.2"
gdb_test "reverse-next" ".*test\.1.*" "reverse-next.2"
gdb_test "next" ".*test\.2.*" "next.3"
with_test_prefix "main" {
gdb_test "reverse-next" ".*main\.1.*"
gdb_test "next" ".*main\.2.*"
}
# now go into test and try to (reverse-)next over the library call
#
# reverse-stepping through the epilogue is not very reliable; depending on
# debug information we may stop at the closing brace or at the return.
#
# instead, run to test
gdb_breakpoint test {temporary}
gdb_test "reverse-continue" ".*test\.1.*"
with_test_prefix "test" {
gdb_test "next" ".*test\.2.*"
gdb_test "reverse-next" ".*test\.1.*"
}

Loading…
Cancel
Save