Browse Source
A number of targets that I test regularly fail the "Build pr22263-1" test for various reasons. arm-linux-gnueabi: "undefined reference to `__aeabi_read_tp'" ia64-linux-gnu: "Explicit stops are ignored in auto mode" m68k-linux-gnu: "undefined reference to `__m68k_read_tp'" microblaze-linux-gnu: "undefined reference to `__tls_get_addr'" nios2-linux-gnu, s390-linux-gnu and sh4-linux-gnu have a tprel reloc in .got riscv64-linux-gnu has a dynamic relocation in text So only riscv really fails the pr. The rest fail due to test issues or lack of a linker optimisation. Lack of an optimisation isn't really a fail, but it's worth keeping the test to ensure those optimisations don't regress. The xfail targets may not be an exhaustive list. This just tidies test results for those for which I have cross compilers installed. PR 22263 * testsuite/ld-elf/tls.exp: Split pr22263 test into two parts, one to check for -z text errors, the other to check tprel linker optimisation. Supply needed symbols and assembler flags. xfail the linker optimisation on targets known to fail.users/aburgess/try-core-file-pid0
1 changed files with 29 additions and 3 deletions
Loading…
Reference in new issue