Tweak wording in comment in last change

ld/emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em

@@ -62,15 +62,16 @@ mmix_after_allocation ()
   bfd_signed_vma regvma;
 
   /* If there's no register section, we don't need to do anything.  On the
-     other hand, if a non-standard linker-script without a mapping from
-     MMIX_LD_ALLOCATED_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME is present, as in the ld
-     test "NOCROSSREFS 2", that section (1) will be orphaned; not inserted
-     in MMIX_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME and (2) we will not do the
-     necessary preparations for those relocations that caused it to be
-     created.  We'll SEGV from the latter error.  The former error in
-     separation will result in a non-working binary, but that's expected
-     when you play tricks with linker scripts.  The "NOCROSSREFS 2" test
-     does not run the output so it does not matter there.  */
+     other hand, if there's a non-standard linker-script without a mapping
+     from MMIX_LD_ALLOCATED_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME when that section is
+     present (as in the ld test "NOCROSSREFS 2"), that section (1) will be
+     orphaned; not inserted in MMIX_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME and (2) we
+     will not do the necessary preparations for those relocations that
+     caused it to be created.  We'll SEGV from the latter error.  The
+     former error in separation will result in a non-working binary, but
+     that's expected when you play tricks with linker scripts.  The
+     "NOCROSSREFS 2" test does not run the output so it does not matter
+     there.  */
   if (sec == NULL)
     sec
       = bfd_get_section_by_name (output_bfd,