Protoization.

gdb/ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2000-09-07  Kevin Buettner  <kevinb@redhat.com>
+
+	* i386mach-nat.c (fetch_inferior_registers, fetch_core_registers):
+	Protoize.
+	* i960-tdep.c (i960_skip_prologue, leafproc_return, mem): Protoize.
+
 Thu Sep  7 21:59:23 2000  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@b1.cygnus.com>
 
 	* aclocal.m4: Regenerate.

gdb/i386mach-nat.c

@@ -40,8 +40,7 @@
 static void fetch_core_registers (char *, unsigned, int, CORE_ADDR);
 
 void
-fetch_inferior_registers (regno)
-     int regno;			/* Original value discarded */
+fetch_inferior_registers (int regno)
 {
   struct regs inferior_registers;
   struct fp_state inferior_fp_registers;
@@ -109,14 +108,21 @@ store_inferior_registers (int regno)
 
 
 
-/* Work with core files, for GDB. */
+/* Provide registers to GDB from a core file.
+
+   CORE_REG_SECT points to an array of bytes, which were obtained from
+   a core file which BFD thinks might contain register contents. 
+   CORE_REG_SIZE is its size.
+
+   WHICH says which register set corelow suspects this is:
+     0 --- the general-purpose register set
+     2 --- the floating-point register set
+
+   REG_ADDR isn't used.  */
 
 static void
-fetch_core_registers (core_reg_sect, core_reg_size, which, reg_addr)
-     char *core_reg_sect;
-     unsigned core_reg_size;
-     int which;
-     CORE_ADDR reg_addr;	/* Unused in this version */
+fetch_core_registers (char *core_reg_sect, unsigned core_reg_size,
+		      int which, CORE_ADDR reg_addr)
 {
   int val;
 

gdb/i960-tdep.c

@@ -331,8 +331,7 @@ examine_prologue (register CORE_ADDR ip, register CORE_ADDR limit,
    prologue.  */
 
 CORE_ADDR
-i960_skip_prologue (ip)
-CORE_ADDR (ip);
+i960_skip_prologue (CORE_ADDR ip)
 {
   struct frame_saved_regs saved_regs_dummy;
   struct symtab_and_line sal;
@@ -479,9 +478,11 @@ frame_struct_result_address (struct frame_info *fi)
 }
 
 /* Return address to which the currently executing leafproc will return,
-   or 0 if ip is not in a leafproc (or if we can't tell if it is).
+   or 0 if IP, the value of the instruction pointer from the currently
+   executing function, is not in a leafproc (or if we can't tell if it
+   is).
 
-   Do this by finding the starting address of the routine in which ip lies.
+   Do this by finding the starting address of the routine in which IP lies.
    If the instruction there is "mov g14, gx" (where x is in [0,7]), this
    is a leafproc and the return address is in register gx.  Well, this is
    true unless the return address points at a RET instruction in the current
@@ -489,8 +490,7 @@ frame_struct_result_address (struct frame_info *fi)
    has been entered through the CALL entry point.  */
 
 CORE_ADDR
-leafproc_return (ip)
-     CORE_ADDR ip;		/* ip from currently executing function */
+leafproc_return (CORE_ADDR ip)
 {
   register struct minimal_symbol *msymbol;
   char *p;
@@ -684,12 +684,13 @@ struct tabent
   char numops;
 };
 
-static int			/* returns instruction length: 4 or 8 */
-mem (memaddr, word1, word2, noprint)
-     unsigned long memaddr;
-     unsigned long word1, word2;
-     int noprint;		/* If TRUE, return instruction length, but
-				   don't output any text.  */
+/* Return instruction length, either 4 or 8.  When NOPRINT is non-zero
+   (TRUE), don't output any text.  (Actually, as implemented, if NOPRINT
+   is 0, abort() is called.) */
+
+static int
+mem (unsigned long memaddr, unsigned long word1, unsigned long word2,
+     int noprint)
 {
   int i, j;
   int len;