Browse Source

Add 'nibbles' to gdb.print_options

When I rebased and updated the print_options patch, I forgot to update
print_options to add the new 'nibbles' feature to the result.  This
patch fixes the oversight.  I'm checking this in.
users/aburgess/try-mips-disasm-styling
Tom Tromey 4 years ago
parent
commit
3028a2dbbf
  1. 2
      gdb/python/py-prettyprint.c
  2. 6
      gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-format-string.exp

2
gdb/python/py-prettyprint.c

@ -753,6 +753,8 @@ gdbpy_print_options (PyObject *unused1, PyObject *unused2)
opts.static_field_print) < 0
|| set_boolean (result.get (), "deref_refs",
opts.deref_ref) < 0
|| set_boolean (result.get (), "nibbles",
opts.nibblesprint) < 0
|| set_boolean (result.get (), "summary",
opts.summary) < 0
|| set_unsigned (result.get (), "max_elements",

6
gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-format-string.exp

@ -1122,11 +1122,13 @@ proc test_print_options {} {
gdb_test "python print('format' in gdb.print_options())" "False" \
"examine format"
check_format_string "a_point_t" "format='t'" \
"Pretty Point \\(101010, 1100\\)" \
check_format_string "a_point_t" "format='t', nibbles=True" \
"Pretty Point \\(0010.1010, 1100\\)" \
"print in binary to fetch options"
gdb_test "python print(saved_options\['format'\] == 't')" "True" \
"format was set"
gdb_test "python print(saved_options\['nibbles'\])" "True" \
"nibbles was set"
check_format_string "a_point_t" "summary=True" \
"No Data" \

Loading…
Cancel
Save